One of the more alarming characteristics of this election season is the fact that both major candidates for president are considered to be dishonest and untrustworthy by a majority of Americans. Of course when you compare it to American people give congress, both Trump and Clinton have the reputations of angels. The public generally holds all politicians in contempt, a trend that has been growing for quite some time and for a variety of reasons.
It was so obvious that it’s rather shocking anyone would deny it. And yet the long-awaited from the UK which reveals that intelligence officials knew that the invasion would cause Iraq to collapse and inevitably grow the environment for terrorism to flourish, for some reason is seen as a vindication of sorts for George W. Bush and Tony Blair by people who insist the two
But they did, repeatedly.
helpfully, based upon . He begins with President Bush’s insistence before the war began that Saddam Hussein had a massive stockpile of biological weapons. However, we know that the CIA told the White House that they “no specific information on the types or quantities of weapons agent or stockpiles at Baghdad’s disposal.” This was evidently something out of Bush’s fever dreams. But it was important.
As much as people were frightened of the prospect of Saddam having nuclear weapons (which Bush also lied about when he said we didn’t know if he had one — ) they were also terrified about the prospect of biological or chemical weapons being used in another terrorist attack. After all, we had just been through the anthrax scare and President Bush was stoking these fears in p and said that Saddam had that could be used to drop bioweapons on Americans. (.)
All of this was done with the implicit suggestion that Saddam was working with Osama bin Laden, the mastermind who had proven he was willing to stage a catastrophic terrorist attack on American soil. That was the big lie that undergirded all the rest. And it was very effective. In September of 2003, six months after the invasion,
Nearly seven in 10 Americans believe it is likely that ousted Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein was personally involved in the Sept. 11 attacks, says a poll out almost two years after the terrorists’ strike against this country.
Sixty-nine percent in a Washington Post poll published Saturday said they believe it is likely the Iraqi leader was personally involved in the attacks carried out by al-Qaeda. A majority of Democrats, Republicans and independents believe it’s likely Saddam was involved.
The belief in the connection persists even though there has been no proof of a link between the two.
Matthews at Vox points out:
On numerous occasions, Dick Cheney cited a report that 9/11 conspirator Mohammed Atta had met in Prague with an Iraqi intelligence officer. He said this after .
More generally on the question of Iraq and al-Qaeda, on September 18, 2001, Rice , which concluded there was little evidence of links. Nonetheless Bush continued to more than a year later.
There were many large and small lies for months on end. My personal favorite is a small one but it’s the one that best illustrates the “you can believe me or you can believe your lyin’ eyes” tactic. In July of 2003, President Bush said
“[W]e gave [Saddam Hussein] a chance to allow the inspectors in, and he wouldn’t let them in. And, therefore, after a reasonable request, we decided to remove him from power…;.”
This is completely wrong. Hussein did let U.N. weapons inspectors in, and they failed to find any weapons. .
Here he is saying it
It was shocking to hear him say it. By this time it was becoming clear that the administration’s stated reason for the invasion — to “disarm Saddam Hussein” — was turning up no WMD. And yet this blatant lie was barely noticed in the press. Here’s how the Washington Post’s why this wasn’t a bigger deal:
“It was on the front page of The Washington Post, but I think what people basically decided was this is just the president being the president. Occasionally he plays the wrong track and something comes out quite wrong. He is under a great deal of pressure.”
How to explain that it “came out wrong” again three years later when the world was finally realizing just how thoroughly they’d been taken for fools when
And when he chose to deny inspectors, when he chose not to disclose, then I had the difficult decision to make to remove him.
If you want to know why so many people believe that their leaders are liars, look no further than the fact that the George W. Bush administration convinced the nation that Saddam Hussein was in cahoots with Osama bin Laden and had weapons of mass destruction which the two evil-doers were planning to use against Americans. A quarter of million people (and counting) died as a result of those those lies. It’s amazing there’s any trust in government at all after that.